Inman News
  HOME   |   NEWS   |   CONFERENCES   |   BLOG   |   WIKI   |   SUBSCRIBE   |  PRODUCTS   |   ADVERTISE   |   ADVICE   |   CONTACT US

Subscriber Resources
Subscribers Home
Search Inman News
Content Warehouse
Cartoon Database
Special Reports
White Papers Series
Audio Files
Inman Blog
Feedback
Connect Registration
Audio Conference

Subscribe Now

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Raising the bar on licenses

Re: 'Utah considers stiffer fines for unlicensed real estate pros' (Feb. 1)

Fining unlicensed real estate professionals who engage in fraud is a very small step in the right direction. Entry standards for licensing are too low in most states, and should be raised. Fines should apply to anyone practicing without a license, whether he/she has engaged in fraud or not. Heavy fines should apply in problem areas such as failure to comply with disclosure laws -- and jail is the appropriate remedy for fraud.

Bruce Hahn
President
American Homeowners Grassroots Alliance


Audio Conference
Inman News Special Report
Inman News Research Report

FREE website
content!

Make Inman.com
your homepage

Link to Inman News

Consumer News

Commercial News

Real Estate Articles from Inman News

Story Tools
E-mail Story Printable Version
Comment on Story Reprint Rights
 

PM Movie

Paying mortgage points a smart investment

Returns are 'astonishing,' so why don't more borrowers take advantage?

Monday, February 05, 2007

By Jack Guttentag
Inman News

"I read recently about a study that says that most people would not profit by paying points on a mortgage. Do you agree with that?"

No. The much-cited study by Yan Chang, senior economist at Freddie Mac, and Abdullah Yavas, research director of the Institute for Real Estate Studies at Penn State's Smeal College of Business, claims that most borrowers don't hold their mortgages long enough to make paying points a good investment. The study based its conclusion on the life of fixed-rate mortgages (FRMs) that were originated and terminated during the period from 1996-2003. But almost two-thirds of the loans in their sample were still in existence at the end of the period, and they are bound to have a longer life than those that were paid off. Further, the study did not cover adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), which in today's market provide the most attractive opportunities for paying points.

Even if the study was right, what "most people" would profit from is beside the point. What matters is whether you would profit from it.

More stories by Jack Guttentag

Don't rush decision to use builder's lender

$750K mortgage fraud too sweet to pass up

Home-loan servicing gone awry

Borrowers eye benefits of FHA home loans

Refinance at 1.25% a disaster in disguise

Homeowners eye stock funds as sweet investments

>>More

Well, then, how do I know whether or not it makes sense for me to pay points?

Points are an investment on which the return consists of lower mortgage payments in the future, and a lower loan balance if the loan is paid off before term, which almost all are. The investment makes sense for borrowers who have the money and find the return high enough to be attractive.

The standard view is that the borrower's time horizon must be quite long to make points worthwhile -- I have made this statement myself many times. However, when I recently calculated rates of return for different types of mortgages, I found that the standard view holds only for FRMs. On ARMs, the returns are high over periods equal to the initial rate period.

For example, while the return over seven years was only 8 percent on a 30-year FRM, on a 7-year ARM it was 22 percent. On a 3-year ARM, the return over three years was 17.5 percent. I found this so astonishing that 10 days later I looked again to be sure I hadn't made a mistake. Sure enough, I hadn't.

Do most borrowers pass up this opportunity?

They do. In the sample selected by Chang and Yavas, less than 15 percent paid points. Borrowers are predisposed against an increase in their cash outlays at closing for a benefit that will accrue in the future. Nobody tells them what the rate of return on investment might be. Often, they aren't even offered the option.

Mortgage brokers and loan officers don't encourage borrowers to pay points. Points make it more difficult for loan officers working for lenders to earn an "overage" -- a price above the lender's stated price, which the loan officer usually shares with the lender.

Similarly, if borrowers pay points for a lower rate, mortgage brokers are forced to disclose their own fees upfront where borrowers can see and possibly question them. The broker can't avoid disclosure when his fee must be added to the points. It is much better to steer the borrower to a loan with a rate high enough that the lender will pay points to get it, referred to as a "yield spread premium," or YSP. Then the broker can pay himself out of the YSP, which existing rules permit to be disclosed in ways that usually mean nothing to the borrower.

How can borrowers be sure that the option to pay points will be made available to them?

One of the advantages of shopping for a mortgage online is that the alternative rate/point combinations appear on the screen. The rates of return shown above were calculated from data shown by one such lender, Amerisave, an Upfront Mortgage Lender. Upfront Mortgage Brokers will also provide the required data. Since their fee is set upfront, they have no financial interest in which rate/point combination the borrower selects.

How do I find the rate of return?

You need two price quotes for the loan type you want. One is the rate/point combination with points closest to zero. The other is the combination for the lowest rate available. Using calculator 11c or 11d on my Web site, enter the two rate/point combinations and the period you expect to be in your house. Presto, you have the rate of return.

The writer is professor of finance emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Comments and questions can be left at www.mtgprofessor.com.

***

What's your opinion? Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected].

Copyright 2007 Jack Guttentag


Back Top

Click Here





Home | News | Blog | Join | Products | Conferences | Advertise | Advice | About Us | Contact Us | Submit a Tip | Privacy | Editorial | Legal | Site Map

©2007 Inman News